%0 Book %D 1978 %T Massachusetts mineral and fossil localities %A Gleba, Peter P %K #Collecting %K #EducationalResources %K #MassGeology %K #MineralResources %K #Minerals %K collecting %K fossils %K minerals %X A PDF of popular Massachusets Mineral and fossil localities compiled by Peter Gleba in 1978, revised in 2008. %I Krueger Enterprises %C Cambridge, MA %G eng %U http://www.geo.umass.edu/stategeologist/Gleba_Mass_Fossil-Min_Localities.pdf %0 Online Database %D 0 %T Massachusetts DEP Hydrogeologic Information Matrix %X
Subsurface and hydrogeologic information
%I Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection %G eng %U http://www.mass.gov/dep/water/compliance/hydromat.pdf %1Subsurface and hydrogeologic information
%0 Online Database %D 2013 %T The Massachusetts Geothermal Data Project %A John Michael Rhodes %A Koteas, G. Christopher %A Stephen B Mabee %A Ryan, Amy %A Isaacson, M. %K #Geothermal %K #MGSPubs %K #Reports %K #Subsurface %K Andover Granite %K aqueous geochemistry %K Cape Anne granite %K ECS %K enhanced geothermal systems %K Fitchburg granite %K geothermal %K granite geochemistry %K granites %K heat flow %K hot dry rock %K hot springs %K thermal %K thermal conductivity %K thermal transmissivity %K whole rock geochemistry %K XRF %X A series of geothermal maps and datasets for Massachusetts derived from data collected by the MGS for Massachusetts and Connecticut. These data include whole rock geochemistry, rock and soil thermal conductivity, hot spring aqueous geochemistry, and derivative thermal and heatflow modeling. The project includes multiple datasets and products which can be accessed here or via the National Geothermal Data System (http://search.geothermaldata.org/dataset?q=Massachusetts). These datasets and products are: Maps: Comprising MGS Miscellaneous Maps 13-01 through 13-08High-resolution compositional mapping and dating of monazite on the electron microprobe is a powerful addition to microstructural and petrologic analysis and an important tool for tectonic studies. Its in-situ nature and high spatial resolution offer an entirely new level of structurally and texturally specific geochronologic data that can be used to put absolute time constraints on P-T-D paths, constrain the rates of sedimentary, metamorphic, and deformational processes, and provide new links between metamorphism and deformation. New analytical techniques have significantly improved the precision and accuracy of the technique and new mapping and image analysis techniques have increased the efficiency and strengthened the correlation with fabrics and textures. Microprobe geochronology is particularly applicable to three persistent microstructural-microtextural problem areas: (1) constraining the chronology of metamorphic assemblages; (2) constraining the timing of deformational fabrics; and (3) interpreting other geochronological results. In addition, authigenic monazite can be used to date sedimentary basins, and detrital monazite can fingerprint sedimentary source areas, both critical for tectonic analysis. Although some monazite generations can be directly tied to metamorphism or deformation, at present, the most common constraints rely on monazite inclusion relations in porphyroblasts that, in turn, can be tied to the deformation and/or metamorphic history. Microprobe mapping and dating allow geochronology to be incorporated into the routine microstructural analytical process, resulting in a new level of integration of time (t) into P-T-D histories. The Legs Lake exhumational shear zone in Saskatchewan is a classic example. Monazite can be tied to decompressional metamorphic reactions in the upper plate and to prograde reactions and shear fabrics in the footwall, firmly constraining the timing of regional exhumations with a long multiphase tectonic history.
%B Abstracts with Programs - Geological Society of America %I Geological Society of America (GSA) : Boulder, CO, United States %C United States %V 35 %P 22 - 23 %8 2003/03/01/ %@ 00167592 %G eng %U http://silk.library.umass.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=geh&AN=2004-076942&site=ehost-live&scope=site %N 33 %! Abstracts with Programs - Geological Society of America %0 Journal Article %J Abstracts with Programs - Geological Society of America %D 2002 %T Monazite geochronology of Proterozoic quartzites; a powerful tool for understanding reactivation of continental lithosphere in the Southwestern United States %A Joseph P Kopera %A Williams, Michael L. %A Jercinovic, Michael J. %K #StaffPubs %K absolute age; %K continental lithosphere; %K crust; %K deformation; %K Geochronology; 03 %K Jawbone Syncline; %K lithosphere; %K Mazatzal Orogeny; %K metamorphic rocks; %K metamorphism; %K monazite; %K New Mexico; %K orogeny; %K Paleoproterozoic; %K phosphates; %K Precambrian; %K Proterozoic; %K quartzites; %K Southwestern U.S.; %K tectonics; %K Tusas Mountains; %K United States; %K upper Precambrian; %XThe influence of approximately 1.65 vs. 1.4 Ga tectonism on the evolution of the Proterozoic orogenic belt in the southwestern United States has been an issue of considerable debate. This belt was assembled at approximately 1.75-1.65 Ga, but recent work has highlighted a significant reactivation of the orogen at 1.4 Ga. The discovery of abundant monazite in regionally extensive, 1-2 km thick quartzites found throughout the orogenic belt may provide important new constraints on its tectonic history. These quartzites define the present regional geometry of exposed Proterozoic rocks and are believed to strongly influence local structure. Preliminary results of in-situ microprobe dating of monazite from the Ortega Quartzite in the Tusas Mountains in northern New Mexico suggest an increasing influence of 1.4 Ga tectonism from north to south within the range. Monazite from the Jawbone Syncline within northernmost part of the range consistently yields ages of 1.75 to 1.72 Ga. These monazite grains are interpreted to be mostly detrital in origin, with REE and age zoning reflecting the history of the source terranes. Monazite from an anticline immediately to the south has 1.72-1.75 Ga detrital cores with 1.67-1.68 Ga rims, implying that initial fold formation occurred during the approximately 1.67-1.65 Ga Mazatzal Orogeny. Monazite from the middle and southern Tusas Mountains is predominantly 1.4 Ga in age. This suggests that a previously documented gradient in deformation and metamorphism from north to south may reflect a multistage tectonic history for the range, with an increasingly intense overprint of 1.4 Ga tectonism to the south. Monazite has also been found in several Proterozoic quartzites in Colorado, allowing the possibility to compare and correlate deformation and metamorphism across the region. Monazite dating in thick quartzites represents a powerful tool by which the effects of approximately 1.65 and 1.4 Ga tectonism can be separated, leading to a better understanding of the evolution and stabilization of Proterozoic crust in the southwestern United States and may be an important new technique in deconvoluting the tectonic histories of other orogenic belts.
%B Abstracts with Programs - Geological Society of America %I Geological Society of America (GSA) : Boulder, CO, United States %C United States %V 34 %P 26 - 26 %8 2002/03/01/ %@ 00167592 %G eng %U http://silk.library.umass.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=geh&AN=2004-069830&site=ehost-live&scope=site %N 11 %! Abstracts with Programs - Geological Society of America %0 Journal Article %J Abstracts with Programs - Geological Society of America %D 2002 %T Monazite geochronology of the Ortega Quartzite: documenting the extent of 1.4 Ga tectonism in northern New Mexico and across the orogen %A Joseph P Kopera %A Williams, Michael L. %A Jercinovic, Michael J. %K #StaffPubs %K anticline %K deformation; %K folds; %K monazite; %K New Mexico; %K orogeny; %K Ortega Group; %K phosphates; %K Precambrian; %K Proterozoic; %K Structural geology; 16 %K tectonics; %K Tusas Mountains; %K United States; %K upper Precambrian; %XPreliminary results of in-situ microprobe dating of monazite from the Ortega Quartzite suggest an increasing influence of 1.4 Ga tectonism from north to south within the in the Tusas Mountains of northern New Mexico. Monazite from the Jawbone Syncline within northernmost part of the range consistently yields ages of 1.75 to 1.72 Ga. These monazite grains are interpreted to be mostly detrital in origin, with REE and age zoning reflecting the history of the source terranes. Monazite from an anticline immediately to the south has 1.72-1.75 Ga detrital cores with 1.67-1.68 Ga rims, implying that initial fold formation occurred during the approximately 1.67-1.65 Ga Mazatzal Orogeny. Monazite from the middle and southern Tusas Mountains is predominantly 1.4 Ga in age. This suggests that a previously documented gradient in deformation and metamorphism from north to south may reflect a multistage tectonic history for the range, with an increasingly intense overprint of 1.4 Ga tectonism to the south. The discovery of abundant monazite in regionally extensive, 1-2 km thick quartzites found throughout the Proterozoic orogenic belt of the southwestern United States may provide important new constraints on the region's tectonic history, specifically, the extent and influence of 1.4 Ga tectonism on the formation and modification of fundamental large-scale structures. These quartzites define the present regional geometry of exposed rocks within the Proterozoic Mazatzal Province, and are believed to strongly influence local structure. In addition to northern New Mexico, monazite has also been found in several Proterozoic quartzites in Colorado, allowing the possibility to compare and correlate deformation and metamorphism across the region. Monazite dating in thick quartzites represents a powerful tool by which we can better understand the evolution and stabilization of Proterozoic crust in the southwestern United States, and may be an important new technique in deconvoluting the tectonic histories of other orogenic belts.
%B Abstracts with Programs - Geological Society of America %I Geological Society of America (GSA) : Boulder, CO, United States %C United States %V 34 %P 10 - 10 %8 2002/04/01/ %@ 00167592 %G eng %U http://silk.library.umass.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=geh&AN=2003-041318&site=ehost-live&scope=site %N 44 %! Abstracts with Programs - Geological Society of America %0 Journal Article %J New Mexico Geology %D 2002 %T Monazite geochronology of the Proterozoic Ortega Quartzite; documenting the extent of 1.4 Ga tectonism in the Tusas Range and beyond %A Joseph P Kopera %A Williams, Michael L. %A Jercinovic, Michael J. %K #StaffPubs %K absolute age; %K dates; %K deformation; %K electron probe data; %K geochronology; %K Geochronology; 03 %K ion probe data; %K mass spectra; %K metamorphic rocks; %K metamorphism; %K monazite; %K New Mexico; %K orogeny; %K Ortega Group; %K phosphates; %K Precambrian; %K Proterozoic; %K quartzites; %K spectra; %K Structural geology; 16 %K tectonics; %K Tusas Mountains; %K United States; %K upper Precambrian; %B New Mexico Geology %I New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources : Socorro, NM, United States %C United States %V 24 %P 59 - 59 %8 2002/05/01/ %@ 0196948X %G eng %U http://silk.library.umass.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=geh&AN=2004-009303&site=ehost-live&scope=site %N 22 %! New Mexico Geology %0 Report %D 2007 %T A microfossil evaluation of sediment deposits on the continental shelf, Merrimack embayment, New England %A Steven A Nathan %A Leckie, R.M. %A Stephen B Mabee %K #MGSPubs %K #Reports %K Foraminifera %K fossils %K Merrimack Delta %K Merrimack Embayment %K Merrimack River %K microfossils %K offshore %K sedimentology %X Final Report to Minerals Management Service, U.S. Department of Interior 60 pages. contact sbmabee @geo.umass.edu %I Massachusetts Geological Survey %P 60 %G eng %0 Generic %D 0 %T MA DCR - Office of Water Resources Rainfall Program %K data %K massachusetts %K rainfall %K water %K water resources %K water supply %I Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation %G eng %U http://www.mass.gov/dcr/waterSupply/rainfall/index.htm %0 Generic %D 0 %T MA DEP Drinking Water Information %K drinking water standards %K massachusetts %K water resources %I Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection %G eng %U http://www.mass.gov/dep/water/drinking.htm %0 Generic %D 0 %T MA DEP - Water Resources of Massachusetts %K massachusetts %K water resources %I Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection %G eng %U http://www.mass.gov/dep/water/waterres.htm %0 Generic %D 0 %T MA DEP - Water, Wastewater, and Wetlands %K massachusetts %K regulations %K wastewater %K water resources %K wetlands %I Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection %G eng %U http://www.mass.gov/dep/water/index.htm %0 Generic %D 0 %T MA Department of Environmental Management, Hazard Mitigation Program %K massachusetts %K natural hazards %G eng %U http://www.state.ma.us/dem/programs/mitigate/index.htm %0 Generic %D 0 %T The Massachusetts DEP Hydrogeologic Information Matrix %K #BedrockMaps %K #Hydro %K #MapDatabase %K #MapsDataPublications %K #QuadIndex %K #SurficialMaps %K aquifer %K catalog %K data %K database %K GEOLOGIC MAP %K ground source heat pumps %K groundwater %K hydrogeology %K index %K maps %K quadrangles %K water resources %X An index of all USGS geologic maps and hydrogeologic publications for Massachusetts, cross-referenced and indexed by town and 7.5' quadrangle. This is an extremely valuable resource for finding geologic data for a given site. %I MassDEP %G eng %U http://www.mass.gov/eea/docs/dep/water/compliance/hydromat.pdf %0 Generic %D 0 %T Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation %K conservation %K fishing %K hunting %K lakes %K massachusetts %K rivers %K water resources %K wetlands %G eng %U http://www.mass.gov/dcr/index.htm %0 Generic %D 0 %T MassDEP Geothermal Integration Fact Sheet %K #Geothermal %K #GeothermalHomeownerResources %K geothermal %K Ground Source Heat Pump %K GSHP %K standing column %X Owners of facilities with non-potable water wells may have the opportunity to reduce their costs for heating and cooling as well as reducing their carbon footprint by installing a ground source heat pump (GSHP) system to meet their heating and cooling needs. Advancing energy efficiency and conservation are priorities for the Commonwealth and MassDEP is helping our regulated community better understand how our energy use has critical environmental consequences. Facilities with non-potable wells should consider whether adding a GSHP to existing water withdrawal schemes can save heating and cooling costs, while also reducing fossil fuel use and associated green house gas emissions. %I MassDEP %G eng %U http://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/massdep/water/reports/geothermal-integration.html %0 Generic %D 0 %T MassGIS %K #GISSoftware %K #Hydro %K #MapsDataPublications %K #Misc %K #QuadIndex %K #Soils %K #Subsurface %K #Topo %K #Water %K DEM %K GIS %K LiDAR %K quadrangles %X MassGIS is the geospatial data clearinghouse for Massachusetts. They distribute LiDAR, DEMs, and other elevation data, in addition to soils maps, hydrologic, cultural, environmental, and geological data. Their online dataviewer, Oliver is a quick and easy way to make your own maps if you do not have access to GIS software. %I MassGIS %G eng %U http://www.mass.gov/anf/research-and-tech/it-serv-and-support/application-serv/office-of-geographic-information-massgis/ %0 Generic %D 0 %T Mindat.org %K #Collecting %K #EducationalResources %K #MapsDataPublications %K #MineralDatabase %K #MineralResources %K #Minerals %K active %K collecting %K dimension stone %K economic geology %K fossils %K gold %K lead %K mineral deposits %K minerals %K mines %K quarries %K rockhound %K sand and gravel %K sand pits %K silver %X "Mindat is the largest mineral database and mineralogy reference website on the internet. This site contains worldwide data on minerals, mineral collecting, mineral localities and other mineralogical data. This site is growing every day, with new mineral information, localities and photographs added by members." %I MinDat.org %G eng %U http://www.mindat.org %0 Generic %D 0 %T Mineral Resources Data System (MRDS) %K #EducationalResources %K #MapsDataPublications %K #MineralDatabase %K #MineralResources %K #Minerals %K collecting %K dimension stone %K economic geology %K gold %K lead %K minerals %K mines %K quarries %K sand and gravel %K sand pits %K silver %X MRDS is a collection of reports describing metallic and nonmetallic mineral resources throughout the world. Included are deposit name, location, commodity, deposit description, geologic characteristics, production, reserves, resources, and references. It subsumes the original MRDS and MAS/MILS. MRDS is large and complex. This service provides a subset of the database comprised of those data fields deemed most useful and which most frequently contain some information, but full reports of most records are available as well. %I USGS %G eng %U http://tin.er.usgs.gov/mrds/ %0 Generic %D 0 %T Minerals Yearbook for Massachusetts %K #Collecting %K #EducationalResources %K #MassGeology %K #MineralDatabase %K #MineralResources %K #Minerals %K industrial %K minerals %K quarries %I USGS %G eng %U http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/state/ma.html